Scorux Logo
Scorux LogoCatalogPrivate ConsultingPricingAbout
Scorux logo

The UX standard for iGaming.

SCORUX is an independent UX evaluation service. We do not operate, promote, or endorse gambling products, nor do we provide gambling advice.

Operated by S9 Production Ltd, Malta.

Product

Slot CatalogPricingPrivate Consulting

Company

AboutFAQContact

Legal

Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyTerms of Use
LinkedIn

© 2026 SCORUX. All rights reserved.

What we do

The UX rating body

for the iGaming industry.

We score, benchmark, and certify slots against a proprietary protocol of 70+ criteria. Our mission: turn UX from a subjective opinion into a measurable business metric that providers, operators, and aggregators can act on.

Slot-specific, not generic UX

Why it exists

iGaming UX is still scored on opinion.

We built the protocol it deserves.

USER INTERACTION LAYERUI COMPONENT ARCHITECHTURECORE GAME LOGIC LAYERSymbol readabilityNavigation accessibilityBonus potentialVisual hierarchyDark patternInnovation

The same method, every slot

Every provider runs playtests. Every operator runs analytics. Nobody runs a standardized evaluation. SCORUX closes that gap with a shared score, a shared vocabulary, and a documented method, designed for providers building slots, operators distributing them, and aggregators integrating them at scale.

Who we are

Built by UX researchers

who know iGaming from the inside.

Yassine

Yassine

Founder & Lead Evaluator

Julie

Julie

Product Owner

Arthur

Your slots deserve

to be scored.

Browse 50+ scored slots or talk to our team about your specific case. No subscription, no retainer, just a benchmark you can use.

Browse the catalog

Arthur

Senior UX Researcher, Mobile

Hugo

Hugo

CTO

Slot-specific, not generic UX

Our 70+ criteria are written for slots: reel feedback, bet escalation, bonus trigger clarity. None transfer to another product category.

A standardized score, not an opinion

A standardized score, not an opinion

Every evaluation produces a /100 score, a radar by category, and a tier badge. Two reports from two providers compare directly, no interpretation needed.

Built to be acted on

Built to be acted on

Each report closes with a prioritized roadmap: what to fix first, what the business gain looks like, what to deprioritize. Providers ship against it in the next sprint.

How we evaluate

Five categories. 70+ criteria.

One score.

Five evaluation categories illustration

Five evaluation categories

Visibility & Accessibility, Comprehension & Controls, Rhythm & Fluidity, Mechanics & Engagement, Visual & Audio Impact. Each criterion is scored against an anchored rubric, not against a reviewer's gut.

Radar chart illustration

Weighted by what actually matters.

Each finding is weighted by severity, business impact, and effort to fix. The result is a roadmap your team can scope into the next sprint: what to fix first, what to plan next, what to deprioritize. A cosmetic misalignment and a broken bonus trigger never share the same urgency.

How we compare

What sets

SCORUX apart.

Scorux

Traditional approach

Slot specificity

70+ criteria built for slot mechanics

Generic checklists or subjective opinions

Independence

Third-party, provider-agnostic scoring

Internal teams or affiliate-driven media

Standardization

Same protocol, every evaluator. Less than 5 points of variance between testers

Different evaluator, different verdict

Industry benchmark

Scored against 50+ evaluated slots

No comparable scores across providers

Output

100-point score with category breakdown

Narrative opinions, no measurable result

Actionability

Prioritized fixes by severity, impact, effort

Surface feedback, no path to improve the slot

Repeatability

Track score evolution release after release

Each release reviewed from scratch

Industry recognition

Public certification badges that signal benchmark position

No third-party badge to display

Slot specificity

SCORUX

70+ criteria built for slot mechanics

Traditional

Generic checklists or subjective opinions

Independence

SCORUX

Third-party, provider-agnostic scoring

Traditional

Internal teams or affiliate-driven media

Standardization

SCORUX

Same protocol, every evaluator. Less than 5 points of variance between testers

Traditional

Different evaluator, different verdict

Industry benchmark

SCORUX

Scored against 50+ evaluated slots

Traditional

No comparable scores across providers

Output

SCORUX

100-point score with category breakdown

Traditional

Narrative opinions, no measurable result

Actionability

SCORUX

Prioritized fixes by severity, impact, effort

Traditional

Surface feedback, no path to improve the slot

Repeatability

SCORUX

Track score evolution release after release

Traditional

Each release reviewed from scratch

Industry recognition

SCORUX

Public certification badges that signal benchmark position

Traditional

No third-party badge to display